{"id":1114,"date":"2011-12-17T19:57:32","date_gmt":"2011-12-17T14:27:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cimforest.in\/?p=1114"},"modified":"2024-10-11T14:17:17","modified_gmt":"2024-10-11T13:17:17","slug":"pccf-maharashtra-tried-to-hush-up-serious-corruption-of-helping-to-grab-reserved-forest-land-by-rajendra-mangarulkar-ifs-in-case-of-madhu-kapoors-incident-which-was-brought-to-light-by-central-empo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/?p=1114","title":{"rendered":"PCCF Maharashtra tried to hush up serious corruption of helping to grab Reserved forest land by Rajendra Mangarulkar IFS in case of Madhu Kapoor&#8217;s incident, which was brought to light by Central Empowered Committee of Supreme court as a serious case of corruption. This was reported by CEC in Richi Rich case of Pune. No-nonsense Principal Secretary Forests, GOM did not agree prima facie with closure report submitted by PCCF to Government. CIM will publish detail report &#038; analysis on said hush up  very soon."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>FOR \u00a0REFRESHING \u00a0YOUR \u00a0MEMORY:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Readers<\/strong>, this is a case of\u00a0 how\u00a0 criminally\u00a0\u00a0 very expensive reserved forest land, around 6 acres \u00a0in Lonavala, Pune (Heart of the Lonawala town) was grabbed for three star Resort.\u00a0<strong>The land is approx valued to be around Rs 40 crores as on date<\/strong> (Village Pangloli, , Tal: Maval, Dist Pune) grabbed in guise of sale\/purchase\u00a0 for construction of a\u00a0 Three star Resort by Mrs Madhu Kapoor with the help of the then Deputy Conservator of Forests, Pune Forest Division, Rajendra Magarulkar IFS, who has many cases of serious corruption\u00a0 against him.\u00a0<strong>It is alleged that he has partnership in the said resort in benami.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>UNDISPUTED FACTS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>As per\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Pathak-CF-Pune-6-4-2010.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">report of Conservator of Forest, \u00a0Pune no. Desk-6\/land\/30\/10-11\u00a0 \u00a0dated 06-04-2010<\/a>, three survey no.s 61, 60 &amp; 59 of village Pangaloli were renumbered to gat no. 13, 14 &amp; 15. The<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-notice-3531.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">notices under section 35(3)<\/a> of \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/IFA-1927.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Indian Forest act<\/a> were issued to the\u00a0 owners of the said land in the year 1956.<\/li>\n<li>After this notice, another\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Private-F-notice.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">notice under section 3(1) <\/a>of Maharashtra Private Forest (acquisition) Act 1975 dated 28-2-1975 \u00a0for survey no. 61 &amp; 59 \u00a0was issued to their \u00a0owners (on the appointed day i.e 30-8-1975) , viz. Prabhakar Purushottam Dahanukar &amp; Khandu Bhima Ambhore respectively.<\/li>\n<li>The office of the DCF Pune vide letter no. B\/Malki<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Private-F-notice.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\/3252 dated 30-8-1976 <\/a>had informed to Collector Pune \u00a0that survey no. 61 &amp; 59 (new gat no.13 &amp; 15) have been acquired under the provisions of Maharashtra Private Forest (acquisition) Act 1975 making the area a deemed Reserved Forest under the control of Government.<\/li>\n<li>Old survey no. 60 and new gat no. 14 of Pangloli \u00a0is reserved forest with ownership of the government. The same was notified in the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-RF-notification-SN601.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">gazztte dated 29-12-1921<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Hence gat no. 13, 14 &amp; 15 of village Pangloli Tal Maval Dist Pune all are reserved forest as per records.<\/li>\n<li>The revenue department has not mutated the entry in<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-7-12.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> 7\/12 extracts of gat no.13 &amp; 15<\/a> of Pangloli and it was not showing Forest department or government of Maharashtra as owner.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>CONSPIRACY BY MADHU KAPOOR:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>On 19<sup>th<\/sup> June 1999 Mrs Madhu Kapoor &amp; Mrs\u00a0 Radhika Mehra purchased reserved forest bearing gat no. 13 &amp; 15 of village Pangloli, Pune by two registered sale deeds.<\/li>\n<li>Their names were immediately mutated in the revenue records . Thus 7\/12 extracts start showing their names as owners of government reserved forests.<\/li>\n<li>Madhu Kapoor &amp; Radhika Mehra made\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-applications.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">applications to Range Forest officer, Shirota (Kamshet) on 16-09-2000<\/a>,\u00a0<strong>informing very clearly\u00a0 that since they want to construct \u00a0bunglow on the gat no.13 &amp; 15<\/strong> for their residential purpose, hence a certificate of census of trees on the said plots from forest department be given to them, so that the same could be submitted to local body authorities for getting NOC for construction of the house.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>CONSPIRACY BY RAJENDRA MANGARULKAR\u00a0 IFS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The Range Forest Officer, Shirota had drawn \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-pangulali-panchanama-with-map.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">two panchanamas dated 23-9-2000<\/a> mentioning number of trees on the said land and submitted his<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-inquiry-report-RFO.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> enquiry report \u00a0dated 1-11-2000<\/a> on applications of Madhu Kapoor &amp; Radhika Mehara to Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF) Pune , Rajendra Mangarulkar.\u00a0<strong>But no where in enquiry report it was mentioned that the said gat no. 13 &amp; 15 are reserved forest and tree census for \u00a0permission to construct bungalow on the said gat no.\u00a0 13\u00a0 &amp;\u00a0 15 can not be issued being a reserve forest and also because it violates provisions of Forest Conservation Act 1980.<\/strong> Also RFO had not informed\u00a0 Madhu Kapoor and Radhika Mehara that it is illegal to construct any bungalow on Reserved forest.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ( Allegedly this was done on verbal directions of Rajendra Mangarulkar).<\/li>\n<li>This enquiry report was processed in the Mangarulkar\u2019s office and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Mangarulkar-Manjoor.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> note sheet<\/a>s were prepared, mentioning following points:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>The Gat no. 13\u00a0 &amp;\u00a0 15 are not forest as per records.<\/li>\n<li>The above Gat no. 13\u00a0 &amp;\u00a0 15 are not in the list of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975.<\/li>\n<li>The said gat no.s do not come under definition of\u00a0 forest as declared by Supreme court.<\/li>\n<li>Letter as requested by Madhu and Mehara be issued.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>3. \u00a0\u00a0<strong>Mangarulkar on 2<sup>nd<\/sup> December has written\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Mangarulkar-Manjoor.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cMANJOOR\u201d on both the note sheets<\/a>. And these note sheets were not being talked by ASK Sinha CCF Pune in any one of his report. In fact, these note sheets can only throw\u00a0 laser light\u00a0 on Mangarulkar\u2019s culpability,\u00a0 responsibility and criminal conspiracy .<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>4.\u00a0 In response to Madhu Kapoor\u2019s request for tree census on reserved forest gat no. 13 &amp; 15\u00a0 for construction of their residential bungalow,\u00a0 Mangarulkar then issued letters no. 2082 &amp; 2083\/2000-02 dated 4-12-2000 to Madhu Kapoor &amp; Radhika Mehara ,\u00a0 informing number of trees on both gat numbers. Since these letters were in response to Madhu Kapoor\u2019s\u00a0 request for construction of resedential bungalow on Gat no.13\u00a0 &amp;\u00a0 15 , hence every authority including collector, Pune; Town planning department, Local municipal authorities taken those letters\u00a0 to be NOC of forest department. According to them, had these land been of forest departent, DCF would have then &amp; there taken objection on construction of bungalow.<\/li>\n<li>5.\u00a0 These letters were used by Madhu and Radhika as NOC of the Forest department every where including in the court cases. And then Madhu Kapoor and Mehara got the status of land changed to Non-agriculture from collector , Pune vide\u00a0 order dated 3-10-2003 and constructed a Two star resort with the name\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cUpper Deck Resort Pvt Ltd\u201d with facility of swimming pool etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>PRESENT SATUS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Madhu &amp; Mehara entered into lease agreement with Upper Deck Resort Pvt Ltd for 33 years, and enteries were taken into 7\/12 extracts accordingly.\u00a0<strong>Finally on 17<sup>th<\/sup> August 2004, District magistrate , Pune issued a licence to start a three star hotel cum Resort on Reserved Forest.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>ACTION INITIATED AFTER\u00a0 MANGARULKAR\u2019S\u00a0 TENURE:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>When Ashok Khadse IFS had taken charge of DCF, Pune in the year 2003, he ordered to book FIR in this case. And accordingly, a Primary offence report (FIR) no 3 of 2003-04\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0was booked in the matter.<\/li>\n<li>After that , Asst Conservator of Forests, Pune had issued a notice dated 12-3-2004 to radhika Mehara &amp; Madhu Kapoor under\u00a0 section 53(2) of \u00a0Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to evict the said premises (Resort). The eviction order was passed on\u00a0 10-6-2004.<\/li>\n<li>Against this eviction Madhu Kapoor has filed a case in the court of Jt Civil Judge Pune vide RCS 801\/2008 of\u00a0 asking for interim injunction in the matter. The said application was dismissed by the order dated\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 .<\/li>\n<li>Civil Judge had allowed forest department to carry out criminal investigation in the matter vide his order dated 23-5-2008\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 .<\/li>\n<li>Against this rejection of civil application, Madhu Kapoor had preferred \u00a0appeal in the court of District Judge, Pune. The District judge had dismissed her appeal vide order dated 29-12-2008 since he also found that all the three gat no. 13, 14, &amp; 15 are reserved forest.<\/li>\n<li>Against this order of District Judge, Madhu had filed Writ petition no. 44 of 2009 in Bombay High court. The Writ petition has not been decided as yet.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Actual criminal conspiracy by Magarulkar , Madhu Kapoor and her daughter, Radhik Mehara and other Forest bigwig of Pune circle:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>As we have already seen through documentary evidences that Gat no.13 and\u00a0 15 of Pangaloli were reserved forest by virtue of their acquisition &amp; notices under Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act 1975.<\/li>\n<li>Further, Gat no.14 of Pangaloli was a reserved since 1921 as per gazette notification.<\/li>\n<li>Madhu Kapoor and her daughter Radhika Mehara has purchased land of gat no.13 &amp; 15 (Reserved Forest). They approached\u00a0 magarulkar and wanted to have an NOC that her land is not forest as it was required by almost all the authorities\u00a0 like Collector, Municipal authorities, Town planning etc. Mangarulkar knew it very well that being Reserved forest , NOC can not be given.<\/li>\n<li>Hence it was Mangarulkar, who \u00a0suggested to Madhu Kapoor that instead of directly asking for NOC, she should\u00a0 write to him asking for a tree census on her private land, which actually is reserved forest ( attention is required that Forest department does not\u00a0 work on any non-forest area) since she wants to construct\u00a0 residential bungalow. And accordingly he issued\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Mangarulkar-4-12-2000.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">tree census report dated 4-12-2000.<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Accordingly, Madhu Kapoor wrote a letter to Forest department for tree census and Mangarulkar has issued a letter mentioning number of trees on gat no.13 &amp; 15 to be used by Madhu Kapoor for non-forestry purpose.<\/li>\n<li>When, Mangarulkar got transferred to Mantralaya as Joint Secretary (R&amp;FD in charge of the same subject dealing in land and FC Act. Here, when Ashok Khadse took charge of \u00a0DCF Pune, he asked the RFO to book offence under the provisions of IFA, 1927 and FC Act 1980. Hence<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-FIR-13-9-2003.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">FIR\/POR was booked on 13-9-2003<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>When \u00a0Mangarulkar was Joint Secretary, he asked Madhu to\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-madhu-kapoor-26-7-2005.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">petition to Minister for Forests<\/a>regarding some encroachment in gat no.14.\u00a0<strong>And the entire forest department\u00a0 started talking about some dispute of survey in Gat no. 14 over type of survey, whether\u00a0it was done by\u00a0plane table one\u00a0 or triangulation method.\u00a0 No body was considering that it was\u00a0 case of selling reserve forest of gat no.13 &amp; 15. <\/strong>In support of this \u00a0following letters of CF, CF And PCCF can be viewed.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-PCCF-DO-Asthana-6-5-08.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PCCF letter to CF 6-5-08<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-Pathak-CF-Pune-6-4-2010.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CF letter dated 6-4-2010<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-CF-Pune-22-10-2010.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CF letter dated \u00a022-10-2010<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-CF-Pune-4-11-2010.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CF letter dated 4-11-2010<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-CCF-Pune-12-1-2011.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CCF letter dated \u00a012-1-2011<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-CF-Pune-12-5-2011.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CF letter dated 12-5-2011<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Role of ASK Sinha in shielding Mangarulkar:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Once the enquiry from the office of the PCCF has started , Sinha started defending Mangarulkar and wrote to PCCF vide\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-CCF-Pune-12-1-2011.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">letter\u00a0 dated 12-1-2011 <\/a>as if Mangarulkar was innocent\u00a0 and since Revenue records were not mutated hence he could not know that it was a clear cut case of sale of Reserved forest.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/MK-PCCF-28-3-2011.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PCCF office vide letter dated 28-3-2011 snubbed\u00a0 Sinha<\/a> and raised very valid points:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>Why any certificate\u00a0 for construction of bungalow was asked from the office of the RFO by any applicant ?<\/li>\n<li>Whether Farm house or bungalow construction is not a non-forestry purpose ?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Knowing fully well that gat no.13 &amp; 15 are reserved forest , when Mangarulkar \u00a0became JS then\u00a0 he directed PCCF vide letter<strong> dated 28-9-2005<\/strong> to look into the case of different way of surveying causing injustice to Madhu Kapoor so that her encroachment can be set right; and her case under FC Act be sent to Government of India\u00a0 to provide her relief.\u00a0 Mr Mangarulkar\u2026.. Is it job of the Forest department to prepare and submit proposal under FC Act to Government or is it a job of agency (In this case it is Madhu Kapoor) ? what is your interst ?\u00a0 When you know that proposal under FCAct can be submitted only when area is a forest then why have you not asked department to move accordingly like in many other cases\u00a0\u00a0 where properties \u00a0of similar offenders were sealed in Lonavala , Khandala , and other area of Pune, \u00a0Thane \u00a0and Raigarh districts \u00a0in similar cases ?<\/p>\n<p>How your case is different from case of Mr Dayal the then DCF Alibagh ?<\/p>\n<p><strong>What ASK Sinha, CCF Pune \u00a0not explained in his report:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What happed to the POR\/FIR dated 13-9-2003 ?<\/li>\n<li>Whether case was investigated or not ?<\/li>\n<li>Whether this case can be compounded or not ?<\/li>\n<li>Why FIR was booked against Mr Kapoor , who at all is not involved in the case and no where in POR , accused are shown to be Ms Madhu Kapoor and Ms Radhika Mehra. This is just to give relief to accused.<\/li>\n<li>Why magistrate having jurisdiction was not informed about the offence booked under his jurisdiction as per provision of CrPC ? Kindly explain Mr Sinha, when the offence committed is non-cognisable then how such offence can be tried\u00a0 and investigated\u00a0 without the order of the magistrate.<\/li>\n<li>Why charge sheet has not been filed\u00a0 in the court, when there is no stay in the matter by any judicial forum.<\/li>\n<li>There was a clear cut permission to investigate by the court order dated passed in RCS\u00a0 then who stopped the investigation in the matter ?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FOR \u00a0REFRESHING \u00a0YOUR \u00a0MEMORY: Readers, this is a case of\u00a0 how\u00a0 criminally\u00a0\u00a0 very expensive reserved forest land, around 6 acres \u00a0in Lonavala, Pune (Heart of the Lonawala town) was grabbed for three star Resort.\u00a0The land is approx valued to be around Rs 40 crores as on date (Village Pangloli, , Tal: Maval, Dist Pune) grabbed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1114"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1114"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1310,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1114\/revisions\/1310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}