{"id":987,"date":"2011-09-25T18:28:19","date_gmt":"2011-09-25T12:58:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cimforest.in\/?p=987"},"modified":"2024-10-11T14:17:17","modified_gmt":"2024-10-11T13:17:17","slug":"read-mantralaya-files-padma-shree-award-to-majumdar-even-after-two-criminal-cases-how-the-then-chief-minister-ashok-chavan-neela-satyanarayan-ias-the-then-principal-secretary-forests-rajen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/?p=987","title":{"rendered":"Read Mantralaya files&#8230;. why Ashok Chavan and others should be prosecuted &#8230;Padma Shree award to Majumdar even after two criminal cases&#8230; how the then Chief Minister, Ashok Chavan , Neela Satyanarayan IAS the then Principal Secretary Forests &#038; Rajendra Mangarulkar IFS, the then Joint Secretary  had interfered in administration of criminal justice system&#8230;&#8230; Judicial criminal proceedings stayed by administrative order&#8230;.. More direct interference in criminal proceedings than by Vilas Rao Deshmukh in Buldhana case, which was fined Rs 10 lacs by Supreme court:  All to save Majumdar, President of Symbiosis Institute in exchange of admission of daughter of Rajendra Mangarulkar in management quota of MBA&#8230; Quid Pro quo&#8230;. Land worth Rs 72 Crores is being offered in Rs 7.60. Lacs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<div>As per <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-Sinha-note.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">report submitted by ASK Sinha, the then Chief Conservator of Forests, \u00a0Pune \u00a0to PCCF Maharashra<\/a> :<\/div>\n<ol>\n<li>That survey no. 81 &amp; 94 in village Bhamurda , Dist Pune had been declared to be reserved forest by\u00a0 government notifications no. 24F dated 1-3-1879, 4375 dated June 1890 &amp; 5971 dated 8-8-1895.<\/li>\n<li>That for plantation,\u00a0 Symbiosis Society Pune was given 3.26 ha Reserved Forest land by State Government,\u00a0 on Senapati Bapat Road, in\u00a0<strong>S.N. 81<\/strong> of Bhamurda Village, Pune on lease for 50 years vide <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-lease-1975-GR.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">TRS\/1873\/73842\/F-5 dated 7-10-1975<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>That because of <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/FC-Act-1980.doc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Forest Conservation Act 1980<\/a>, this lease was revised by Government of Maharashtra and only 0.6 ha Reserved forest land was leased vide <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-Govt-31-5-1985.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">letter FLD\/1981\/2015\/F-3 dated 31-5-1985<\/a> with changed conditions to the Symbiosis only for planation. Hence new lease document and lease rent document were prepared and accordingly Symbiosis Institute had deposited lease rent\u00a0 till 1995.<\/li>\n<li>That Deputy Conservator of Forests, Pune division had cancelled the lease deed\u00a0 vide<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-18-8-99.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> letter no. B\/desk-3\/ land\/1437 dated 18-8-1999<\/a> and not accepted the lease rent from the Symbiosis society, because of provisions of section 2(3) of Forest Conservation Act 1980.<\/li>\n<li>Section 2(3) of FC Act reads as follows:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 120px;\"><strong>&#8220;2. Restriction on the dereservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 120px;\">Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force in a State, no State Government or other authority \u00a0shall make, except with the prior approval of the Central Government, any order directing-<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 150px;\"><strong> (iii) that any forest land or any portion thereof may be assigned by way of lease or otherwise to any private person or to any authority, corporation, agency or any other organisation not owned, managed or controlled by Government;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">6. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0That after cancellation\/non-renewal of lease deed \u00a0by the government, and after 1995 when lease rent was refused to be accepted by the government, forest department ought to have \u00a0taken possession of the leased land from Symbiosis Institute; but forest officers of various ranks have not done that \u00a0for oblique motives till today. The possession of the land is still with Symbiosis Institute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">7. \u00a0 \u00a0That when first lease agreement was signed between Symbiosis and Government of Maharashtra in the year 1975 , 3.26 ha reserved forest was handed over to the Symbiosis Institute. Out of this land of 3.26 ha, Government had de-forested 0.84 ha of land for construction of Symbiosis Law college (<strong>notification of\u00a0dis forestation\u00a0not available any where nor the date of notification is ever mentioned in any government \u00a0document <\/strong><strong>subsequently<\/strong>) . \u00a0After disforestation, it was ordered to be transferred to the Revenue department\u00a0 to be further transferred to \u00a0Symbiosis Institute vide government letter no. FLD-1977\/252265\/F-3 dated 9-2-1978. But this order was modified by the <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-Govt-31-5-1985.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Government vide it\u2019s memo dated 21-5-1985<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">8. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 That Government vide <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-lease-GR-1985.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">memo dated 21 may 1985<\/a> ordered following changes regarding original 3.26 ha of land :<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<ul>\n<li>Disforested 0.84 ha land transfer order for construction of Symbiosis Law college be cancelled (Land to be transferred to Symbiosis Institute),<\/li>\n<li>This deforested 0.84 ha land to be transferred to Symbiosis Institute for Dr Baba Saheb Ambedakar Memorial garden .<\/li>\n<li>0.60 ha reserve forest land (leaving aside above said 0.84 ha area), on which Symbiosis Institute had done plantation, should be allowed to remain on lease with Symbiosis Intitute on the condition envisaged in original lease agreement of 1975.<\/li>\n<li>Symbiosis Institute be given area of Pagoda already constructed by Symbiosis on this said area of 0.84 &amp; 0.60 ha.<\/li>\n<li>Further, except the said area of 0.84 plus 0.60 ha i.e total 1.44 ha, \u00a0remaining area (3.26-1.44= 1.82 ha) <strong>1.82 ha be taken back by Forest department.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>CCF of Maharashtra state was directed by the government to implement this Resolution of the Government and compliance report was to be submitted to the Government.<\/li>\n<li><strong>That till today, the 1.82 ha commercial very very expensive land has not been taken in possession by Forest department from Symbiosis Institute because of oblique motives even after the government orders.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">9. \u00a0 \u00a0 That as per lease deed dated 1-9-1986 made between Government &amp; Symbiosis Institute \u00a0due to government order\u00a0 dated 31-5-1985, \u00a0following conditions in lease documents are reproduced:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Condition no.4<\/strong>: The land shall not be used for any purpose other than planting tree.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Condition no. 6<\/strong>: The grass from the leased area shall be sold on cutting terms only preferably to the animal husbandary department, as on terms and conditions agreeable to both the parties. But as per record since handing over possession no such sale had been made and revenue of grass had been misappropriated.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Condition no. 8<\/strong>: \u00a0The lessee shall repair and keep in good order all special and other boundary marks defining the boundaries of the forest.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Condition 12<\/strong>: If the land is, in the opinion of the government not adequately used for the purpose for which it is leased or if, in the opinion of the government, there is a breach or the conditions of the lease, the lease <strong>shall be liable to be terminated<\/strong> on 3 months notice.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Condition no<\/strong>. 13:\u00a0 on expiry of the lease or in the event of earlier resumption by governmentif any contingency mentioned above, the land shall be peacefully surrendered without claiming any compensation for improvement &amp; structure, failing which the occupants will be liable to be summarily evicted.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">10. \u00a0 \u00a0In the year 2003, Symbiosis \u00a0Pune had altered the boundary pillars of reserved forest &amp; encroached on the reserved forest in\u00a0<strong>SN 81 &amp; 94<\/strong><strong> <\/strong>Bhamurda Village , Pune \u00a0and further acted criminally in violation of provisions of section 26 and 63 of Indian Forest Act and of Forest Conservation Act 1980. \u00a0A POR (\u00a0<a title=\"FIR 2003\" href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-POR-2003.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>FIR no. 0-1\/2003-04 dated 27-6-2003<\/strong><\/a>) for \u00a0offence under section 26, \u00a0of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and violation of FC Act 1980\u00a0\u00a0was registered by Round officer Bhamurda, Pune against \u00a0Symbiosis . But after filing of this POR (FIR), \u00a0no charge sheet was submitted in the court of JMFC against the culprit till now even after 8 years of filing the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">11.\u00a0 After registering the FIR, Symbiosis Institute had submitted a proposal under Forest Conservation Act,1980 for using forest\u00a0 land for non-forestry purpose to Deputy Conservator of Forests Pune. The then <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-FC-rejection-khadse.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">DCF Pune had rejected &amp; \u00a0filed \u00a0the said proposal<\/a>. \u00a0 Once the proposal was rejected by the DCF Pune, Majumdar approached to Forest Minister, Mr Pachpute though his <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-majumdar-5-5-2005.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">letter dated 5-5-2005<\/a> requesting to grant the reserved forest land to him. Government on 22-3-2006 had sent the letter of Majumdar to PCCF for needful action and report back to government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">12. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0That even before Government of India accords sanction under FC Act, 1980 the Symbiosis Institute had chain-linked fenced, concretized the area and encroached\u00a0 the Reserved forest land in survey no. 81 &amp; 94 of Bhamurda village.\u00a0 <strong>This led to registering of another <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-POR-2005.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">FIR no. 4\/2005-06 on 11-6-2005 <\/a>against\u00a0\u00a0 Symbiosis Institute <\/strong>under provisions of section 26 of Indian Forest Act and section 2 of FC Act 1980.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>13. <\/strong>After entire investigation, Chief Conservator of Forest cum Nodal officer, Maharashtra State, Nagpur vide his<strong> <\/strong><strong><a title=\"CCF permission prosecute\" href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-CCF-permission-prosecution.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>letter no. Desk-17\/Nocell\/2\/AD11346\/395A dated 13-6-2006<\/strong> <\/a> <\/strong>has granted permission to file charge-sheet against Dr S.B. Majumdar of Symbiosis, in the court of \u00a0Judicial Magistrate First class, Shivajinagar Court, Pune for offence committed under section 26 (f), (h), 63(a). After going through the investigation papers , he reached to the conclusion that it is very much required to file the charge sheet in the court of law.\u00a0In pursuance of CCF\u2019s permission\u00a0 to prosecute, the then DCF, Pune had directed the Range Forest Officer, Bhamuda Range, Pune to file the charge sheet in the court of JMFC, Pune <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-DCF-JMFC.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">vide his letter dated 3-7-2006<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>14. <\/strong><strong>Immediately after Chief Conservator of Forests had given permission to file charge sheet against Mr S.B. Majumdar on 13-6-2006, Dr. Majumdar, President of Symbiosis Institute \u00a0had approached Maharashtra Government vide his letter dated 10-7-2006 \u00a0to get his criminal trial stayed. <\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>HOW Neela Satyanarayan &amp; Mangarulkar stayed prosecution after FIR:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>15. <\/strong><strong>That the <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-stay-file.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Government file no. FLD1906\/CR-55\/f-10 <\/a><\/span> reveals that on Dr Majumdar\u2019s letter dated 10-7-2006 , desk officer has brought to the notice of Under secretary, Joint Secretary, Mr Rajendra Mangarulkar and Principal Secretary, Ms Neela Satya Narayan that after filing the FIR and due investigation in the case, Chief Conservator of Forests cum Nodal officer, Maharashtra State had given permission to\u00a0 file the charge sheet in the court of JMFC, Shivajinagar, Pune. \u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">But the then Joint Secretary, Rajendra Mangarulkar who got his daughter , Ms Neha Mangarulkar admitted in the Symbiosis Institute for MBA course 2006-08<\/span> , which is confirmed <\/strong><strong> by <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-Majumdar-letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Dr Majumdar in his letter dated19-2-2010 <\/a>. \u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Rajendra Mangarulkar in quid pro quo\u00a0had adviced on 24\/7\/2006 to Principal Secretary \u00a0(Forest), \u00a0Neela Satyanarayan IAS \u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0stay criminal proceedings till the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests gives his comments on the letter dated 10-7-2006 of Dr Majumdar. This was agreed by Principal Secretary, Ms Neela Satyanarayan on 25-7-2006.<\/span><\/strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong> Accordingly by Government letter dated 25-7-2006 (<\/strong><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">same day when file was approved by Principal Secretary<\/span>) all the criminal proceedings in the matter was stayed by the government<\/strong><strong>. This was gross interference in administration of criminal justice system. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Point of interest is that this file was not approved by the government ( Hon\u2019ble Minister Forests &amp; Chief Minister). It is pertinent to mention here that even government has no power under CrPC to stay any criminal judicial proceedings. More surprising part is that copy of this illegal stay order \u00a0was also given to the accused, Majumdar.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>16. <\/strong><strong>Needless to mention that Rajendra Mangarulkar IFS had not mentioned or brought this very fact to the notice of Government ( Read Minister or\u00a0 Chief Minister) \u00a0\u00a0that neither investigation can be stopped by Government nor prosecution against a non-public servant\u00a0 requires any sanction of the government. Thus, by staying the criminal judicial process illegally\u00a0 by mis-using it\u2019s authority, Government has interfered in criminal administration system. ( And for the same type of interference\u00a0 Maharashtra Government has been fined Rs 10 lacs by Supreme court recently, where the then Chief Minister, Vilasrao Deshmukh \u00a0had interefered in the same analogous way). <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>17. <\/strong><strong> <\/strong><strong>Even after reminding this provision of law, Government had not vacated the stay on proceeding in accordance with law. Neither, CCF Pune nor the then HOFF Mr C.S. Joshi had directed the investigating officer to proceed in accordance with law. Otherwise also, illegal stay by Government had been granted only on FIR of 2005 and not on FIR of 2003.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">18. \u00a0 \u00a0 Meanwhile, the then DCF , Pune, Mr Ashok Khadse\u00a0 had issued\u00a0<a title=\"Rs 7.62 crores\" href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-DCF-7-crore.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> <strong>letter dated 2-8-2006<\/strong><\/a> to Symbiosis Institute, that they must submit a guarantee money<strong> <\/strong><strong>letter of Rs 7,21,88,970\/- (Rs Seven Crore twenty one lac eighty eight thousand nine hundred seventy Only)<\/strong> for the cost of 0.7446 ha forest land, as per existing market rate , if they want to get their proposal processed for clearance under FC Act. (Though this rate is also very less in comparison of actual prevailing rate in the area. With average rate @\u00a0 6000\/- per sq feet it should cost around Rs 32 crores.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">19. \u00a0 \u00a0 That the state government had sent proposal under FC Act to Government of India\u00a0 for clearance of forest land to be used by Symbiosis Institute for non-forest use. The cost of the land mentioned in the proposal was only 7.62 lacs instead of Rs 7.62 crores suggested by Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Maharashtra State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>CRIMINAL CULPABILITY OF C.S. JOSHI IFS &amp; J.N. SAXENA IFS IN HUSHING UP THE MATTER:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The illegal stay order issued by Government dated 25-7-2006 on criminal proceedings is sill there since Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Maharashtra did not give his opinion on the letter of Majumdar. Knowing fully well illegal stay on criminal proceedings, both JN saxena &amp; CS Joshi, who were PCCFs during \u00a02006 to 2010 did not give remarks deliberately and government took advantage of this. CS Joshi, who was PCCF during the period of Ashok Chavan as Chief Minister <a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/Symbiosis-PCCF-Report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">did ultimately give \u00a0his remark <\/a>only when Ashok Chavan was removed as Chief Minister and he was about to be retired. This also he did only when a complaint was made to the government \u00a0and his action was called under RTI Act. JN saxena, was so afraid of remarks that he did not do any thing in the matter for almost one long year. Hence both are criminally culpable in the matter and should be prosecuted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>ROLE OF BP PANDE IAS, ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY &amp; ASHOK CHAVAN THE THEN CHIEF MINISTER IN INTERFERENCE IN JUDICIAL PROCESS :<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>20. <\/strong> <strong>That on a complaint by one Mr Manish Singh,<a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-Manish-file.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> file <\/a><\/strong><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/cimforest.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Symbiosis-Manish-file.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> was again put up before government on 25-10-2010<\/a> by desk officer.\u00a0 Desk officer, Under secretary and Joint Secretary categorically\u00a0mentioned in the file that<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<ul>\n<li><strong> <\/strong><strong>stay granted by government on prosecution dated 25-7-2006 and filing of charge sheet in court should be lifted.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Proposal submitted by state government to Government of India for FC Act clearance should be called back from Government of India.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">But on 6-3-2010\u00a0 Additional Chief Secretary Mr B.P.Pande had over-ruled lifting of stay on prosecution and mentioned that this decision should be taken only after comments are received from PCCF on letter sent to him almost 4 years ago. \u00a0[<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Pandeji&#8230; do you mean to say if PCCF says that administrative stay should continue on a criminal proceedings, the government would have accepted it&#8230; which otherwise also government was doing. \u00a0Pande has served as District Magistrate during his earlier days of \u00a0service and he is absolutely aware of CrPC and provisions of law. Thus it is he, who should be prosecuted immediately.]<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Hon&#8217;ble Forest Minister had approved it and Mr Ashok Chavan , the then Chief Minister had decided against the recommendation of the department &amp; Forest Minister. He wrote \u00a0that since regularization proposal had already been sent to Government of India\u00a0 hence supplementary information be submitted to Government of India and wait for decision of Central Government. Thus, Ashok Chavan finally decided against lifting of stay on prosecution and calling back the proposal submitted to Government of India under FC Act.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">21. \u00a0 \u00a0 That when Mr Prithviraj Chavan had taken over as Chief Minister, the file was resubmitted by desk officer on 8-11-2010 with following recommendation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<ul>\n<li>Proposal submitted to Government of India under FC Act be called back from there and<\/li>\n<li>Since PCCF vide his letter dated 8-6-2010 had submitted the comments on Dr Majumdar\u2019s letter dated 10-6-2006 that is why stay dated 25-7-2006\u00a0 granted on filing of charge sheet be lifted.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">The Joint Secretary, Principal Secretary and Forest Minister had approved the file on 12-10-2010 and 16-11-2010 respectively but the chief Minster had not cleared the lifting of stay even after almost\u00a0 one year and file is pending since then.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As per report submitted by ASK Sinha, the then Chief Conservator of Forests, \u00a0Pune \u00a0to PCCF Maharashra : That survey no. 81 &amp; 94 in village Bhamurda , Dist Pune had been declared to be reserved forest by\u00a0 government notifications no. 24F dated 1-3-1879, 4375 dated June 1890 &amp; 5971 dated 8-8-1895. That for plantation,\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=987"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1314,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987\/revisions\/1314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cimforest.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}